Back to the dashboard
Wichita State University · Spending and faculty pay against Kansas, Kansas State, Oklahoma, Nebraska and Colorado State

Wichita State and its peers

Ask the data

Ask about a faculty salary, a department or college average (tenure-track vs. non-tenure-track), a budget line, a trend over the years, or a comparison between universities. Answers come only from the source documents and arrive as a table and chart whenever the numbers call for one — or click a suggested follow-up.

Side by side · WSU vs. Kansas State vs. Oklahoma vs. Nebraska–Omaha vs. Colorado State

Five universities, the same budget line: WSU spends the least, and is the only one cutting it

Spending on the line, actual dollars

$50M $75M $100M $125M $150M $175M $200M $225M $250M $275M $300M $325M $350M $318.6M $215.9M $203.1M $136.0M $99.13M $342.0M · +7.3% $255.2M · +18.2% n/a $229.6M · +13.0% $146.0M · +7.4% $96.61M · −2.5% FY24FY25FY26FY27
Wichita State Kansas State Oklahoma Nebraska–Omaha Colorado State

Click any university above for a detailed, category-by-category comparison with WSU.

Each school publishes a core-budget line for what it spends on teaching faculty. Since FY24, WSU's Instruction line (all funds, including restricted) has fallen 2.5% to $96.6M and lost 3.0 points of budget share. Over the same years Kansas State is up 18.2% to $255.2M, the University of Oklahoma's budgeted faculty salaries are up 13.0% to $229.6M, Nebraska–Omaha's Instruction line is up 7.4% to $146.0M, and Colorado State's is up 7.3% to $342.0M.

Peers · faculty pay by rank · FY27

Average FY27 faculty salary by rank: Wichita State against Kansas and Nebraska

Budgeted salary of full-time faculty at Wichita State, the University of Kansas and the three University of Nebraska campuses, by rank. Department chairs are included at their rank and deans are left out on every side. Pick a field for a like-for-like comparison; the whole-university view mixes very different fields.

Field

Loading the peer salary data…

† fewer than 10 people: read as individuals, not a trend. “Peers pooled” weights each peer by its number of people at that rank. Kansas has only FY2026–27 and none of the Kansas or Nebraska files has an FTE field, so part-time appointments are counted at the salary shown; Wichita State is full-time (1.0 FTE) lines only. Nebraska is total salary, including chair and endowed stipends. Kansas State, Oklahoma and Colorado State do not publish faculty salaries by person, so they appear in the spending comparison above but not here.

Which departments are counted?

Wichita State’s Barton School against Nebraska–Omaha in detail →

Peers · the same people over time · FY21–FY27

The same tenure-track faculty, FY21–FY27: Wichita State against the Nebraska campuses

Faculty who are in the data in every comparison year, on the same track throughout, never a chair or dean, so the lines follow one fixed group at each university and composition cannot move them. Wichita State is the full-time budgeted salary; Nebraska is the base rank salary, so chair and endowed stipends never count as raises. FY26 is left out everywhere because the Nebraska FY26 file is not in the data; Kansas publishes only FY2026–27 and cannot be followed. “Same rank only” removes everyone promoted in the window (tenure-track only: within non-tenure-track the files do not mark promotions consistently).

Track
Field
Raises

Loading…

† fewer than 10 people. “In the data FY21” counts the faculty each university started with; the gap to “same people every year” is turnover and role changes, not sampling. “Per year” is the compound annual rate over the six years. People who changed track, held a chair or a dean-type role, or missed any year are left out on every side, so the pools follow one rule. A person belongs to the field of their FY21 college (Wichita State) or FY21 department (Nebraska); the field department lists are the same as in the pay-by-rank section above. UNO and UNK have no engineering faculty in the data.

Peers · who works there: administration, high pay, faculty and staff · FY21–FY27

Senior administration over time: Wichita State against the Nebraska campuses

How many people each university budgets — senior administration (president or chancellor, provost, the vice, associate and assistant versions, general counsel and chief officers; deans, directors and support posts are not counted), staff paid $100K or more (a fixed nominal line), tenure-track and non-tenure-track faculty (deans excluded, chairs included), and all staff — and what each group costs in total. One rule on every side. Nebraska’s system-wide executives (its president, system vice presidents, general counsel) sit in a separate central administration and are not in these campus figures; Wichita State has no such separate layer, so its count carries functions Nebraska keeps centrally — the dashed line, Wichita State without NIAR and the Division of Research, removes its research arms. KU publishes no staff data.

Measure

How many people

What the group costs in total

Loading…

Combined pay is the sum of the group’s budgeted salaries that year, so it moves with both headcount and raises, and the group is whoever holds such a position each year, not a fixed set of people. A person’s budget lines are summed before the $100K test. Athletics positions are never counted as senior administration.

Back to the dashboard